Meaning
Systematic cost analysis often involves the physical disassembly and evaluation of a competitor or partner product to catalog every individual part and material. A bill of materials teardown generates a highly detailed list of these components, noting their dimensions, weight and manufacturing processes. This analysis provides baseline data that helps procurement teams estimate the actual production costs of the item.
It is restricted to physical goods that can be acquired and dismantled.
Component Costing
Granular cost estimation is possible when each part of a product is examined and priced. Engineers calculate the material cost of plastics, metals and electronic sub-assemblies based on current commodity market rates. They also estimate the machining or molding time required to produce each piece.
This data allows the buying organization to build a bottom-up cost model that reveals the manufacturer’s likely production margins.
Supplier Benchmark
Comparative analysis of components from different vendors highlights opportunities for cost reduction or quality improvement. By comparing the parts from a competitor with their own, design teams can identify where the competitor has used cheaper materials or simplified assembly steps. This benchmarking helps in renegotiating supply agreements with existing vendors.
It provides objective data to challenge high price quotes.
Procurement Strategy
Sourcing decisions are guided by the findings of the physical analysis. Knowing the exact structure of a product allows a company to specify alternative materials or consolidate parts to reduce assembly labor. This knowledge strengthens the buyer’s position during contract negotiations.